BIP 110, a proposal to temporarily cap arbitrary data stored on the Bitcoin blockchain for one year, faces a fork deadline with no miner backing behind it. The measure emerged from an ongoing dispute over so-called spam transactions that use Bitcoin's block space to embed non-financial data. Prominent figures including Michael Saylor and Blockstream's Adam Back have voiced opposition, arguing that escalating a disagreement over spam into a full consensus battle could introduce risks greater than the spam problem itself. With miner support registering at zero, the proposal appears unlikely to activate through a contentious fork. The debate reflects broader tensions within the Bitcoin community over how block space should be used and whether protocol-level restrictions are the appropriate remedy. Critics favor market-based or optional solutions rather than mandatory rule changes enforced through network splits.
— Sponsored —
Trade smarter on BYDFI
Get a bonus on your first deposit — from $50 at $100, up to $2,000 at $20k. 200x leverage, 600+ perpetuals, deep liquidity.